![]() ![]() And they don't even particularly enforce it against hackintosh communities. Just that the roadblocks to it happening are (a) more than they were for Intel and (b) much more than would meet the eyes with the viewpoint/theory that you currently have (and that I once had as well).Ĭlick to expand.? the only issue that Apple has is with running their Software on non-mac Hardware. You WILL, however, get it with Windows for ARM64 running on a VM running on a type 2 hypervisor running in macOS, but that's because you're running a Mac app designed for macOS which, again, IS optimized for Apple Silicon. You're not going to get this kind of performance efficiency with Windows for ARM64 running on Apple Silicon. Apple literally designs these SoCs around macOS and around where they think its users need more performance, let alone performance per watt. However, Apple Silicon SoCs are performance optimized for macOS. Yes, it's true that writing a new bootloader that is compatible with iBoot isn't insurmountable, even if it's substantially more than was required to run x86 and x86-64 versions of Windows on Intel Macs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |